IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Managing Specialty Crop Risk in North Carolina: A Working Paper


  • Robinson, James
  • Marlow, Scott
  • Madeley, Michelle


One of the ways we create resiliency within agriculture and help farmers plan for inevitable crops losses is the use of crop insurance. Through crop insurance policies, farmers are able to recoup a portion of their lost income. Crop insurance options vary in several ways, including type of crop and type of loss covered. The varying types and levels of coverage create a disparity in coverage availability. In 2011, $747 million of North Carolina's $1.4 billion in specialty crop farm receipts were not eligible for a single-crop policy. This risk management void decreases specialty crop producers’ competitiveness by increasing their vulnerability to weather disasters, thereby reducing their access to credit and making operating financing more difficult to obtain. This paper focuses on three issues in effort to improve future risk management programs: 1) Identify specialty crops that are most vulnerable due to the lack of crop insurance availability, 2) determine, through farmer input, how crop insurance policies can better cover specialty crop income in North Carolina, and 3) identify regions in North Carolina that appear to have a higher level of specialty crop risk.

Suggested Citation

  • Robinson, James & Marlow, Scott & Madeley, Michelle, 2013. "Managing Specialty Crop Risk in North Carolina: A Working Paper," 2013 AAEA: Crop Insurance and the Farm Bill Symposium 156824, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaeaci:156824
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.156824

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL:
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item

    More about this item


    Agricultural and Food Policy; Agricultural Finance; Risk and Uncertainty;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaeaci:156824. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: . General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.