IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea16/235956.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Do Governmental and Private Conservation Funds Crowd Out Open Space Spending?

Author

Listed:
  • Prendergast, Patrick
  • Lang, Corey

Abstract

There are many different vehicles that can be used to conserve land within towns. For example, towns can spend money on conservation through open space related expenditures in their budget, residents can vote on a referendum to fund conservation with bonds, private land trusts can purchase land development rights, and governmental grants can be used to fund conservation. The attraction or repulsion of funding sources for land conservation have only been investigated in some of these vehicles, however. Our paper investigates the spatial relationship between conservation funding sources that have not been examined before in a regression discontinuity framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Prendergast, Patrick & Lang, Corey, 2016. "Do Governmental and Private Conservation Funds Crowd Out Open Space Spending?," 2016 Annual Meeting, July 31-August 2, Boston, Massachusetts 235956, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235956
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.235956
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/235956/files/Prendergast_Lang_AAEA_poster.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.235956?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea16:235956. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.