The Externalities of Conventional and Organic Pest Management: When Do Gains to Cooperation Exist?
During the 1990s, demand for organic products increased on average by 20% each year. This growth in demand fueled growth in organic crop acreage. Between 1992 and 2005, organic cropland more than quadrupled, going from 403,400 acres to just over 1.7 million acres (USDA, 2008). Demand is predicted to increase annually by an additional 9 to 16% through 2010 (Dimitri and Oberholtzer, 2005). This further increase in demand will lead to an additional expansion of organic acreage, increasing the heterogeneity of agricultural regions and increasing the interaction that occurs between conventional and organic farms as they more frequently share the same regional landscape. Sharing the same landscape implies that they share pest and natural enemy populations. The movement of these organisms links farms within a region, potentially causing one grower’s pest control decisions to impact other growers. This paper examines these interactions. The analysis focuses on one organic and one conventional profit-maximizing grower. One pest and one natural enemy population connect the time periods in the model, and the movement of these populations connects the grower’s fields, creating a spatial-dynamic model. The analysis compares the privately optimal levels of pest control on the neighboring farms with the socially optimal levels of pest control. This comparison will illuminate situations when private decisions lower the region’s total profits via negative externalities created by the movement of insects. The model examines how these externalities differ under different population dynamics.
|Date of creation:||2009|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202|
Phone: (414) 918-3190
Fax: (414) 276-3349
Web page: http://www.aaea.org
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea09:49550. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.