IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea09/49446.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Just a Paycheck? Assessing Student Benefits of Work on Faculty Research Projects

Author

Listed:
  • Mathews, Leah Greden

Abstract

The benefits that students gain from designing and implementing their own independent undergraduate research projects is often presented as a valuable step in their academic career, and a stepping stone to graduate school success. However, it is not clear what benefits students receive when working as undergraduate research assistants on faculty research projects where they, the students, have little or no input into the project or its design. This paper reports on a survey of undergraduate students who participated as wage laborers on two separate faculty-directed research projects. The results of the study suggest that students gain valuable knowledge and skills that serve as constructive preparation for work, personal lives and graduate school careers; in addition, their participation in research enhances their overall undergraduate experience.

Suggested Citation

  • Mathews, Leah Greden, 2009. "Just a Paycheck? Assessing Student Benefits of Work on Faculty Research Projects," 2009 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, 2009, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 49446, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea09:49446
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.49446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/49446/files/Just%20a%20Paycheck%20Assessing%20Benefits%20of%20Work%20on%20Faculty%20Research%20Projects.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.49446?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Teaching/Communication/Extension/Profession;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea09:49446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.