IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/afres2018_154.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Assessment of the Appropriateness of the Different Facilities Management (FM) Approaches in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • O. D. Ajayi

Abstract

purpose of the study was to examine FM organizations’ choice of approaches (insourcing, outsourcing and hybrid) in creating value under their classification of management functions. The classifications namely Strategic FM functions, Tactical FM functions and Operational FM functions were considered. The methods employed in the collection of data included the administration of questionnaire to client organizations’ directors in the study area. The sample frame comprised the 94 FM client organizations listed in the 2016 edition of the Directory of the International Facilities Management Association (IFMA), Nigeria Chapter). The study undertook a total enumeration survey of all the listed FM organizations in Lagos Metropolis. Also, descriptive statistical techniques such as frequency distribution and Relative Importance Index (RII) were used to analyze data. The findings revealed the inherent value adding capabilities of each of the three procurement approaches. For instance, under the strategic FM function, firms preferred to outsource the provision of strategic advice; while they preferred to insource space reallocation. Additionally, their perceptions revealed that both minimization of equipment and structural failures; and maximization of trade staff productivity can be outsourced and insourced. Under the tactical FM function, the firms preferred to outsource service quality in support of their business operations; insource standard needs and quality of performance; and indeed prefer to either insource or/and outsource budgets that has adequate longrun values. At the operation FM function, the firms preferred to outsource effective project management; insource the monitoring of time balance, quality and cost; and preferred to either outsource or insource the development of operation and maintenance needs. However, for the research implications, the study provided insights on the delivery of optimized value addition for Facilities Managers. The RII will direct and guide facilities managers in either effective budgeting or judicious disbursing of resources for the execution of the FM functions in line with the relative levels of importance of the underlying criteria. Also for the practical implications, insightful ideas on how to expand the overall FM service delivery at best value for money was provided. The originality of the work is such that majority of the studies on FM appear to have only examined the benefits of In house and Outsourcing approaches exclusive of the Hybrid approach; this study not only examined the three (3) approaches but also determined their appropriateness and value-adding capabilities.

Suggested Citation

  • O. D. Ajayi, 2018. "An Assessment of the Appropriateness of the Different Facilities Management (FM) Approaches in Lagos Metropolis, Nigeria," AfRES afres2018_154, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2018_154
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-afres2018-154
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/system/files/afres2018_158.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Facilities Management (FM); Hybrid; in-house (insourcing); Operational; Outsourcing; Strategic; Tactical;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2018_154. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.