Author
Listed:
- Joseph Awoamim Yacim
- Douw Gert Bosho
Abstract
There are a number of models that are used for mass appraisal of properties. However, the choice of a model is predicated on a number of criteria. One of these criteria is to compare models predictive accuracies that are reflected in minimum error of estimates. This study focuses on comparing predictive accuracies of mass appraisal models with a datasets of 3494 property transactions from the city of Cape Town, South Africa. Five mass appraisal models including back propagation trained artificial neural networks, multiple regression model, M5P tree, support vector machine optimise with sequential minimal optimisation and additive nonparametric regression were used for the simulations. Waikato Environment for Knowledge Analysis (WEKA) explorer; an open source data mining software was used to pre-processed property data to normalised values and model property prices. The analysis shows that BP trained artificial neural networks (BP-ANN) and M5P tree utilised in this study predicted better results with root mean squared error and mean absolute error within acceptable threshold of 5%. But M5P tree shows distinctiveness in predicted results between normalised and absolute values which require further examination. The other three mass appraisal models including multiple regression model, additive nonparametric regression and support vector machines with simulated minimal optimisation predicted RMSE that are higher than 5% acceptable threshold. With these results it is hereby recommended that mortgage lenders, valuation offices in South Africa, the rest of Africa and beyond should consider utilising BP-ANN in their mass appraisal predictions.
Suggested Citation
Joseph Awoamim Yacim & Douw Gert Bosho, 2016.
"Comparison Of Mass Appraisal Models For Effective Prediction Of Property Values,"
AfRES
afres2016_151, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
Handle:
RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2016_151
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2016_151. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.