IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/afres2016_104.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Social Networks And Sales Transactions In South African Office Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Nalumino Akakandelwa
  • Steven Devaney
  • Kathy Pain

Abstract

Scarcity of information on office transaction opportunities contributes to office markets being illiquid. Asset and vendor identity is problematic since information is privately held and highly localised in geographically dispersed markets. DiMaggio and Louch (1998) and Rangan, (2000) demonstrate how social networks resolve market uncertainty where conversional mechanisms which rely on publicly available information are not practical. The research question is how social networks are used to resolve uncertainty in commercial office sales markets.METHODOLOGY: The paper adopted an exploratory research approach. Data was collected through in-depth face-to-face interviews with opportunistically sampled commercial real estate brokers in Johannesburg, South Africa. Data was organised using NVivo (1999) ® and employed constructivist theoretical thematic analysis.FINDINGS: Social networks seem relevant in high-value office sales transactions involving sophisticated clients. Brokers use social networks to access private information on clients’ acquisition and disposal criteria, manage information on transaction activity as per clients’ interests, pool potential buyers, channel business opportunities, and build relations and trust. Transaction are likely to be publicly marketed when they involve unsophisticated clients or unknown buyers.RESEARCH LIMITATIONS: There is descriptive validity threat relating to factual validity of respondents’ accounts. There are also interpretive validity threats on accuracy of respondents’ interpretation of contexts, and researcher’s interpretation of responses. Introducing non-mainstream real estate concepts and using an opportunistic sample presents a theoretical validity threat of a plausible theoretical framework associating social networks to office sales transactions.RESEARCH IMPLICATIONS: This paper contributes to understanding how social networks address information asymmetry in sales transactions where conventional mechanisms are not able to cost-effectively do so.

Suggested Citation

  • Nalumino Akakandelwa & Steven Devaney & Kathy Pain, 2016. "Social Networks And Sales Transactions In South African Office Markets," AfRES afres2016_104, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2016_104
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-afres2016-104
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/system/files/afres2016_104.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:afres2016_104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.