IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/2021-027.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The South African Municipal Valuation Standards for Property Rating

Author

Listed:
  • Roshinee Naidoo

Abstract

Purpose: The Local Government: Municipal Property Rates Act No 6 of 2004 (MPRA) heralded a new era for property rating for South Africa. There are no existing localised Standards for Property Rating in South Africa. The purpose of the project was therefore to develop a set of municipal valuation standards which are appropriate to the South African context. In this space there are varying performance by appointed Municipal Valuers and recurring issues relating to the inconsistent delivery of the property register/valuation roll. Together with the lack of expertise in the Municipalities due to the high turnover of staff and different interpretations of legislative requirements, the aim was to therefore customise the South African Municipal Valuation Standards for Property Rating.Design/Methodology: The MPRA is the primary reference point. This legislative framework has supported the development of these standards. It provides the specific legislative requirements in the valuation of property and the compilation and maintenance of valuation rolls for the levying of property rates. It also provides a legislative platform for compliance and assigns responsibilities to the property valuation profession (municipal valuers) and the municipalities. The structure and format of the standard have included the applicable MPRA sections that relate to the municipal valuer function, responsibilities, and obligations, and includes professional valuation practice notes with the applicable corresponding standard. The Practice Note: Templates and Annexures in the standard is intended as supporting best practice in the interpretation and understanding of a particular standard.Findings: Due to the evolving nature of mass valuations and technological advancements in this field. The Standard has a bias towards data and management of data which forms the basis of modern mass valuation principles and the application of computer assisted mass appraisal techniques. The valuation profession must have mass appraisal training if the municipalities, are to benefit from this competency.Practical Implications: The Standards will therefore promote standardisation, efficiency, uniformity and consistency through rules and benchmarks in the preparation and maintenance of valuation rolls (municipal rating), to improve quality and standards for equitable municipal rating. The document also includes setting limits, rules and benchmarks for monitoring and applying the standard and provides for practice notes, guidelines, and technical guidance to support implementation, interpretation and understanding of the standard. Today, we have the customised version known as the STANDARD: MUNICIPAL VALUATIONS FOR PROPERTY RATING (sMVPR), version 8.3 after being reviewed by the International Valuation Standards Council (IVSC). This version with associated appendices has been adopted by SACPVP for the implementation of the Local Government Municipal Property Rates Act and is driven by International best practice which was adapted for use in South Africa. Similarly, a Monitoring Framework has now been developed, the focus is on the Professional Performance and Conduct within the Municipal valuation and rating space. The Investigations and Ethics Committee of SACPVP will monitor any transgressions by the Municipal Valuers.

Suggested Citation

  • Roshinee Naidoo, 2021. "The South African Municipal Valuation Standards for Property Rating," AfRES 2021-027, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2021-027
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-2021-027-0
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Mass Appraisal; Municipal Rating; Municipal Valuations for Property Rating; SACPVP;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2021-027. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.