IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/2021-023.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Analysing the Effectiveness of the Delivery of Learning Materials to the Fourth Year Real Estate Class at University of Botswana

Author

Listed:
  • Johnson Kampamba
  • Simon Kachepa
  • Kefilwe Seketeme

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to analyse the effectiveness of the delivery of learning materials to fourth year real estate class. This was based on the research problem derived from the literature that low retention of learning materials by learners is attributed to the challenges that human beings face in absorbing what they have learnt through listening. The study wanted to establish if what students learn through listening, reading, visualisation and demonstration can be remembered in a class exercise. This was conducted based on the above learning materials to establish the level at which they recalled what they had learnt using different methods of pedagogical mode of instructions.Design/Methodology: Learning materials were presented to the class for the past two weeks for twelve hours session using different pedagogical methods. In week one, students were given learning materials in form of a presentation covering the skills of listening and visual images. In week two, the learning materials was delivered using reading notes and demonstrations with examples. Based on the literature reviewed, on how to prepare a good oral presentation, it identified the level of absorption by learners through listening to be around 40%, reading about 30% and seeing around 60% to 80% and demonstration about 30% and that the amount of data that they are likely to remember will be in that range. These models were used to assess the learning achieved by the learners. An exercise was administered to 24 students in a class of 27 students to test and validate what the above theories had indicated in the literature.Findings: It was discovered that on the question that was prepared based on the listening theory, students did not do well because their ability to recall what they had listened was constrained as per what the theory stated. Only about less than 42% of students were able to retain what they had listened and read to during the delivery of the lecture. On the visualisation theory, about 75% were able to remember what they had seen with their own eyes and the images that were presented to them. Finally, 92% were able to remember what they had demonstrated in class in form of an example.Practical implications: When using pedagogical strategies, lecturers should be cognisant of the blended learning by varying the teaching styles so that learners have a higher chance of remembering what they were taught in class. Students have a higher tendency to remember materials that involved them in demonstrating how the concept was done than listening to the lecturer. Lecturers should develop learning materials that will help students understand without much difficult.Value of the study: The study identifies deficiencies in the pedagogical model of delivery of learning materials and how the assimilation of materials can be improved through blended learning.

Suggested Citation

  • Johnson Kampamba & Simon Kachepa & Kefilwe Seketeme, 2021. "Analysing the Effectiveness of the Delivery of Learning Materials to the Fourth Year Real Estate Class at University of Botswana," AfRES 2021-023, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2021-023
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-2021-023
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Blended Learning; demonstration; learning aids; pedagogical strategy; skills; teaching materials; Visualisation;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2021-023. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.