IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/2021-015.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perception on Modular Construction for Low-Income Housing in South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Prisca Simbanegavi
  • Pride Ndlovu

Abstract

Purpose: Modular: Construction is touted as a panacea to low-income housing for its speed in delivery, yet its use is still scanty in those countries that have the greatest shortage of low- income housing. The paper identifies this alternative construction method as a research gap on whether the product can be acknowledged and accepted by built environment stakeholders.Design/Methodology: In depth interviews showed some themes on what delays the implementation of this technology in building the much-needed low-income housing in South Africa.Findings: Results show that developers are ready to embrace non- traditional construction techniques for the development of low-income housing. The main concern raised is that modular construction creates the impression that modular housing are temporary solutions than a permanent solution for the masses. Further, modular housing is associated with low quality and this perception precludes the engagement of the financial sector in financing asupposedly ‘valueless asset’. The finding is that government as a stakeholder is highly likely to embrace modular housing for low-income people should they be persuaded of their value.Practical implications: The paperrecommends more incentives by government for developers to start building good quality examples of modular housing. These examples will have potential to appeal to local communities and help raise awareness of modular construction as a solution to mass production of low-cost housing.

Suggested Citation

  • Prisca Simbanegavi & Pride Ndlovu, 2021. "Perception on Modular Construction for Low-Income Housing in South Africa," AfRES 2021-015, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2021-015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-2021-015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Built environment stakeholders; Johannesburg; Low-Income Housing; mass production; modular construction; South Africa;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2021-015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.