IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/afr/wpaper/2019-114.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Do Startups Choose Coworking In Developing Countries? Case Study Of Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Tayo Odunsi
  • Ayo Ibaru

Abstract

Globally, coworking has significantly grown with the turn of the decade. This growth has been significant in developing countries like Nigeria in part as a response to the nascent startup economy that needed inexpensive space, infrastructure and technical support on growing their businesses. Few were aware of the coworking concept in general and the idea struggled to gain traction in these early years. Starting in 2016, Nigeria’s economy would go into a 5-quarter long recession which would heighten the need for companies to keep their expenses low. This meant a definite demand for more technology, fewer hands and inexpensive workspaces. Coworking service providers moved in to fill the need and have since grown from less than 10 in 2010 to well over 100 in 2019. By providing access to convenient working environments, respectable office addresses, strong infrastructure, a network of budding entrepreneurs and funding by venture capitalists, Coworking spaces are establishing themselves as the de-facto business community. Per square metre prices for standard office spaces remain out of reach to the average startup. But what are the reasons and features startups like most about coworking? We carry out surveys why startups choose coworking in developing countries, with a special focus on Nigeria.

Suggested Citation

  • Tayo Odunsi & Ayo Ibaru, 2019. "Why Do Startups Choose Coworking In Developing Countries? Case Study Of Nigeria," AfRES 2019-114, African Real Estate Society (AfRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2019-114
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://afres.architexturez.net/doc/oai-afres-id-2019-114
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2019-114. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.