Author
Abstract
Land administration as one of the mechanisms of availing property rights to owners cannot be achieved unless there are well-functioning and coordinated institutional frameworks. Institutions are there to provide legal frameworks, technical, human and financial support to help land administration initiatives work effectively. The number of these institutional frameworks may be insignificant on rendering property rights if not well organised and focussed. Instead of being opportunities, they may become challenges to land administration in the country. This paper explored the challenges emanating from the existing institutional frameworks dealing with land administration in providing property right in Burundi. A mixed research design has been applied to capture qualitative and quantitative data. A desk review of different government reports, academic and professional papers as well as books have been consulted. Also, structured and semi-structured interview have been used to collect primary data on property rights in Burundi. A total of 60 respondents have participated in this paper such as officials in land department, local leaders, and individual landowners. A nonprobability, with snowball sampling method has been applied to identify 60 respondents (40 for structure interview and 20 semi-structured interviews). Descriptive analysis and inferential statistics have been used in data analysis. The findings show that Burundi has got many institution frameworks, but are fragmented and dispersed. This engendered the lack focus on specific issues related to land administration. As results, challenges faced by many groups of people are not addressed by these institutions which make these people to have less property rights. Consequently, these people are marginalised; becoming poor and pauper, and suffering from food insecurity. Also, they live in extreme poverty, their children are dropping out from their studies and even some families flee the country. Therefore, the government of Burundi is advised to have one ministry that will deal with land issues with focus and specificity.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- R3 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:afr:wpaper:2019-076. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Architexturez Imprints (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/afresea.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.