Author
Listed:
- Panagiota Koliousi
(Athens University of Economics and Business)
- Natasha Miaouli
(Athens University of Economics and Business)
- Apostolis Philippopoulos
(Athens University of Economics and Business)
Abstract
The debate on the way of stabilizing the economy, through cuts in public spending or rises in taxes, has been intensified after the crisis in 2008. This holds primarily for the Eurozone periphery countries. In view of high public debts, these countries have been urged to adopt restrictive fiscal policies which have further dampened demand and have worse- ned the recession, at least in the short term. It is known that within a dynamic general equilibrium (DGE) model with a representative agent a reduction of capital tax rates and the move of the tax burden to labour taxes produces social welfare benefits. However, one should not neglect the resulting distributional implications, which may favour some social groups vis-a-vis others. Such distributional implications are significantly influenced by imperfections in product and labour markets. Thus, this paper employs a DGE model that in- corporates heterogeneous agents (entrepreneurs and workers) and imperfectly competitive product and labour markets, augmented with a relatively rich public sector, to quantify the macroeconomic and distributional implications of fiscal reforms like the above in the euro area. Our main results are as follows: First, the most effective policy for the gover- nment to boost output is to reduce the capital tax rate, regardless the policy instrument that adjusts. In addition, if the goal of tax-spending policy is to promote welfare, then it should decrease the tax rate on labour and increase the consumption tax rate. Finally, a reduction in any of the tax rates, financed by an increase in capital tax rate, leads to a fall of inequality between the two social groups.
Suggested Citation
Panagiota Koliousi & Natasha Miaouli & Apostolis Philippopoulos, 2016.
"Fiscal policy reforms in a general equilibrium model with imperfections,"
Working Papers
201608, Athens University Of Economics and Business, Department of Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:aeb:wpaper:201608:y:2016
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
;
;
;
JEL classification:
- J5 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining
- I1 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Health
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:aeb:wpaper:201608:y:2016. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Katerina Michailidou (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/auebugr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.