IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ads/wpaper/0017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Evolution of Focal Points

Author

Listed:
  • Ken Binmore

    (Department of Economics, University College London)

  • Larry Samuelson

Abstract

Theories of focal points typically assume that games have inherent labelings or "frames" and then construct models of how players perceive and exploit these frames to identify focal equilibria. This paper asks instead how evolutionary considerations determine which aspects of a frame are likely to be monitored by the players. Efficient monitoring turns out to be an unlikely outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Ken Binmore & Larry Samuelson, 2002. "The Evolution of Focal Points," Economics Working Papers 0017, Institute for Advanced Study, School of Social Science.
  • Handle: RePEc:ads:wpaper:0017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sss.ias.edu/publications/papers/econpaper17.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Binmore, Ken & Samuelson, Larry & Young, Peyton, 2003. "Equilibrium selection in bargaining models," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 296-328, November.
    2. Bonaventura, Luigi & Caserta, Maurizio, 2004. "An adaptive evolutionary behaviour for the demand-led growth adjustment," MPRA Paper 2527, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Jonathan Beck, 2004. "Fixed, Focal, Fair? Book Prices Under Optional Resale Price Maintenance," CIG Working Papers SP II 2004-15, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin (WZB), Research Unit: Competition and Innovation (CIG).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ads:wpaper:0017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nancy Cotterman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ssiasus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.