IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stpchp/978-1-4419-7228-6_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Changing Bases of Party Support in Italy and Japan: Similarities and Differences

In: A Natural Experiment on Electoral Law Reform

Author

Listed:
  • Daniela Giannetti

    (University of Bologna)

  • Naoko Taniguchi

    (Teikyo University)

Abstract

This chapter explores the link between electoral reforms and structural changes in the social bases of party support in Italy and Japan. Italy and Japan offer important case studies as they underwent significant electoral reform in the early 1990s as part of a more general process of political change. Both in Italy and Japan, corruption scandals and increasing public dissatisfaction with politicians resulted in demands for electoral reform. Electoral reform was seen as an institutional means of changing the system of political representation to promote alternation of parties in power, increase transparency and efficiency in government, and reduce the opportunities and incentives for corruption (Katz 2001; Reed and Thies 2001a).

Suggested Citation

  • Daniela Giannetti & Naoko Taniguchi, 2011. "The Changing Bases of Party Support in Italy and Japan: Similarities and Differences," Studies in Public Choice, in: Daniela Giannetti & Bernard Grofman (ed.), A Natural Experiment on Electoral Law Reform, chapter 0, pages 35-59, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4419-7228-6_3
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4419-7228-6_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stpchp:978-1-4419-7228-6_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.