IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/stcchp/978-3-030-48598-6_17.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

IAC Probability Calculations in Voting Theory: Progress Report

In: Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models

Author

Listed:
  • Abdelhalim El Ouafdi

    (University of Lyon, UJM Saint-Etienne, GATE UMR 5824)

  • Issofa Moyouwou

    (ENS-University of Yaounde I)

  • Hatem Smaoui

    (Université de La Réunion, CEMOI EA13)

Abstract

Over the past two decades, IAC probability calculation techniques have made substantial progress, particularly through methodological studies that have linked these calculations to their appropriate mathematical framework. We report on this progress by a brief description of the methods of calculation used in this field and by reviewing some of the results that the application of these methods made it possible to obtain.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdelhalim El Ouafdi & Issofa Moyouwou & Hatem Smaoui, 2021. "IAC Probability Calculations in Voting Theory: Progress Report," Studies in Choice and Welfare, in: Mostapha Diss & Vincent Merlin (ed.), Evaluating Voting Systems with Probability Models, pages 399-416, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-030-48598-6_17
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-48598-6_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Harrison-Trainor, Matthew, 2022. "An analysis of random elections with large numbers of voters," Mathematical Social Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 68-84.
    2. Mostapha Diss & Michele Gori, 2022. "Majority properties of positional social preference correspondences," Theory and Decision, Springer, vol. 92(2), pages 319-347, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:stcchp:978-3-030-48598-6_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.