IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/ssrchp/978-3-319-63423-4_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Trade-Off Between Redundancy, Protection, and Imperfect False Targets in Defending Parallel Systems

In: Recent Advances in Multi-state Systems Reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Xiao

    (Southwestern University of Finance and Economics)

  • Rui Peng

    (University of Science and Technology Beijing)

Abstract

A substantial amount of research over the past decades has studied the reliability of different systems, but most of them are restricted to systems with only internal failures. In practice, systems may fail due to unintentional impacts or intentional attacks. In this chapter, we first provide a comprehensive review of the research on improving system reliability. The survey shows that, for systems subject to intentional attacks, providing redundant system elements, protecting genuine elements, and deploying false targets are the three important measures to increase the system survivability. The trade-off between protecting genuine elements and deployment of imperfect false targets has been studied before, however, subject to a fixed number of genuine elements in the system. This chapter studies the trade-off between building redundant genuine elements, protection of genuine elements and deploying imperfect false targets in the defense of a capacitated parallel system. Numerical examples are carried out to illustrate the applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Xiao & Rui Peng, 2018. "Trade-Off Between Redundancy, Protection, and Imperfect False Targets in Defending Parallel Systems," Springer Series in Reliability Engineering, in: Anatoly Lisnianski & Ilia Frenkel & Alex Karagrigoriou (ed.), Recent Advances in Multi-state Systems Reliability, pages 227-239, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-319-63423-4_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63423-4_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Di & Yan, Xiangbin & Peng, Rui & Wu, Shaomin, 2020. "Risk-attitude-based defense strategy considering proactive strike, preventive strike and imperfect false targets," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:ssrchp:978-3-319-63423-4_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.