IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-642-33012-4_90.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Assessment of Hydrogen Storage Technologies by Using Compromised Weighting Method

In: Proceedings of 2012 3rd International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation (IEMI2012)

Author

Listed:
  • Pao-Long Chang

    (Feng Chia University)

  • Chiung-Wen Hsu

    (Feng Chia University)

  • Chih-Min Hsiung

    (Feng Chia University)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to establish an assessment model for hydrogen storage technologies and examine its applicability. The model is based on multicriteria decision making (MCDM). Evaluation criteria that conform to government policies are adopted. The model involves the use of criteria weights assigned by experts, and a constrained least-squares method to obtain a compromise set of weights; appropriate hydrogen storage technology options are subsequently determined by using the weights. The model indicates that metal hydride technology is the most appropriate for Taiwan. Therefore, this technology should be given top priority for further development in order to promote industrialization.

Suggested Citation

  • Pao-Long Chang & Chiung-Wen Hsu & Chih-Min Hsiung, 2013. "Assessment of Hydrogen Storage Technologies by Using Compromised Weighting Method," Springer Books, in: Runliang Dou (ed.), Proceedings of 2012 3rd International Asia Conference on Industrial Engineering and Management Innovation (IEMI2012), edition 127, chapter 0, pages 907-917, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-33012-4_90
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33012-4_90
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-642-33012-4_90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.