IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-75999-7_188.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

A View on Manifold Method Comparing with Fintite Element Method

In: Computational Mechanics

Author

Listed:
  • G. Chen

    (Kyushu University, Department of Civil Engineering)

Abstract

Numerical modeling problems can be categorized into two types: continuous deformation analysis and discontinuous deformation analysis in most cases. The former is mainly concentrated on strain-stress analysis for continuous media with small deformation. Finite Element Method (FEM) is one of the well-known methods widely used for this purpose. The latter is mainly concentrated on simulating failure propagation, rigid body movements of discontinuous media with large deformation. Distinct Element Method (DEM) (Cundall. 1980) and Discontinuous Deformation Analysis (DDA) (Shi & Goodman, 1984) are known as the effective methods for this kind of simulations. However, as the development of computation technology, it is a strong requirement that a numerical analysis method should be applicable to both the continuous and discontinuous analysis for solving the same problem. For this reason, the Manifold Method (MM) (Shi, 1991) is attracting attentions of geotechnical engineers more and more because it is just the method applicable to both continuous and discontinuous analysis. MM was developed by Shi in 1991 and further improved in 1997. It contains and combines FEM and DDA in a unified form. In handling discontinuities such as faults, joints and cracks, MM takes over all the advantages of DDA, and for strain-stress analysis problems, it is as powerful as FEM. Therefore, MM can be considered as a potential effective numerical method for geotechnical modeling. In order to pursue its practical applications in geotechnical engineering, the theory of MM has been introduced by means of approximation theory instead of the original topological concepts in this paper. Close comparisons of MM with FEM based on triangular mesh have been made in various aspects such as formulization procedures, definitions of elements and displacement functions, integration methods. Thus, the correspondences and differences between MM and FEM have been outlined, and the merits of MM over FEM have also been summarized clearly. And these merits have been shown by two application examples. Therefore, we expect that the Manifold Method will be put into wide applications in civil engineering

Suggested Citation

  • G. Chen, 2007. "A View on Manifold Method Comparing with Fintite Element Method," Springer Books, in: Computational Mechanics, pages 388-388, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-75999-7_188
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75999-7_188
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-75999-7_188. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.