IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-540-71451-4_12.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Developing Business Excellence While Delivering Responsible Competitiveness

In: Management Models for the Future

Author

Listed:
  • Nikos Avlonas

    (American College Of Greece)

  • John Swannick

    (University of Bath)

Abstract

There is a coherent business approach which brings together all facets of corporate responsibility – leadership, values, policy and processes, people, customers and society – to deliver improved performance. The EFQM Excellence Model helps us to: ensure we have a clear and constant purpose, it helps us to focus on the delivery of results. focus on customers and how we can create value by better meeting their needs. focus by systematically applying processes and fact-based assessments to manage our business and to make our strategic decisions. identify what we need to do to develop our people and maximise their potential. derive value from meeting our responsibilities to the communities we serve. achieve sustainable Excellence. The EFQM CSR Framework, based on the EFQM Excellence model, is more suited to its purpose than other CSR specific frameworks as it more obviously: is business driven; aligns corporate responsibility with business strategy; aligns with balanced scorecard strategic and tactical priorities; delivers intrinsic internal and external benchmarking opportunities; facilitates stakeholder engagement at all levels of the organisation. links self-assessment, improvement activity and external reporting The areas for improvement, identified in self-assessment against the Framework, are translated into prioritised objectives and key performance indicators developed to measure performance against these objectives. Working with colleagues across the business, bringing their particular knowledge and expertise to bear on the process, those objectives will inevitably reflect key business unit priorities. The intention for Lloyds TSB is to deliver corporate responsibility performance that reflects the key strategic priorities of the business and aligns the organisationÂ’s corporate responsibility priorities with the business strategy to deliver value. The areas for improvement, identified in self-assessment against the Framework, are translated into prioritised objectives and key performance indicators developed to measure performance against these objectives. Working with colleagues across the business, bringing their particular knowledge and expertise to bear on the process, those objectives will inevitably reflect key business unit priorities. The intention for Lloyds TSB is to deliver corporate responsibility performance that reflects the key strategic priorities of the business and aligns the organisation’s corporate responsibility priorities with the business strategy to deliver value.

Suggested Citation

  • Nikos Avlonas & John Swannick, 2009. "Developing Business Excellence While Delivering Responsible Competitiveness," Springer Books, in: Jacob Eskildsen & Jan Jonker (ed.), Management Models for the Future, pages 1-14, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-71451-4_12
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71451-4_12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elias G. Carayannis & Evangelos Grigoroudis & Dimitra Stamati, 2017. "Re-visiting BMI as an Enabler of Strategic Intent and Organizational Resilience, Robustness, and Remunerativeness," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 8(2), pages 407-436, June.
    2. Rick Edgeman & Jacob Eskildsen, 2014. "Modeling and Assessing Sustainable Enterprise Excellence," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(3), pages 173-187, March.
    3. Erik G. Hansen & Stefan Schaltegger, 2016. "The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 133(2), pages 193-221, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-540-71451-4_12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.