IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-319-46916-4_15.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Chances and Risks of Using Clicker Software in XL Engineering Classes – From Theory to Practice

In: Engineering Education 4.0

Author

Listed:
  • Valerie Stehling

    (RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)

  • Ursula Bach

    (RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)

  • René Vossen

    (RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)

  • Sabina Jeschke

    (RWTH Aachen University, IMA/ZLW & IfU)

Abstract

Teaching and learning in XL-classes is a huge challenge to both lecturers as well as students. While lecturers face the difficulty of speaking to a mostly loud and very heterogenic audience, students often lack the opportunity of being an active participant in class. To counteract these difficulties and give the opportunity of immediate feedback, an audience response system has been introduced in the class of information technology in mechanical engineering at RWTH Aachen University. In a previously published paper [1] the theoretical background has been outlined and presumptions have been drawn. The described redeployment of a lecture of the mentioned size was expected to bring about an enhancement of the quality in teaching of professional knowledge. It was also supposed to foster the often desired shift from teaching to learning. Now, after a first trial and evaluation of the method, these presumptions can be tested. In this paper clicker questions from the lecture and their results are the groundwork that allow for a review of the evaluation of the first trial using clicker software in class. Results shall then allow for a comparison of the intended goals with the actual outcomes from the students’ point of view. In addition to that, feedback and ideas for improvement through the evaluation of the “further comments” section by the “users” themselves can be gathered. The results of the analysis will then allow for an adjustment and improvement of the concept and may in the future give support to lecturers of other XL-classes that intend to implement an audience response system in their own lecture.

Suggested Citation

  • Valerie Stehling & Ursula Bach & René Vossen & Sabina Jeschke, 2016. "Chances and Risks of Using Clicker Software in XL Engineering Classes – From Theory to Practice," Springer Books, in: Sulamith Frerich & Tobias Meisen & Anja Richert & Marcus Petermann & Sabina Jeschke & Uwe Wilkesmann (ed.), Engineering Education 4.0, pages 185-195, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-46916-4_15
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-46916-4_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-319-46916-4_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.