IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-27901-1_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

CTBT Negotiations and the Split-the-Difference Principle

In: Focal Points in Negotiation

Author

Listed:
  • Mordechai Melamud

    (CTBTO - Retired, Freelance Researcher)

  • Rudolf Schuessler

    (University of Bayreuth, Department of Philosophy)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the negotiations that led to the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty (CTBT). The treaty includes provisions on potential testsite inspections. The authors show that focality and salience played a role at multiple levels in the negotiations concerning inspections. Many of the positions initially put forth by parties to the negotiations were salient. Moreover, as negotiations progressed, two of these acquired particular prominence: a simple majority (50%) and two-thirds majority. In the end, the number agreed upon was the middle between these two solutions, a principle that in itself can be seen as a focal point solution that respects the moral plausibility of the outcome.

Suggested Citation

  • Mordechai Melamud & Rudolf Schuessler, 2019. "CTBT Negotiations and the Split-the-Difference Principle," Springer Books, in: Rudolf Schuessler & Jan-Willem van der Rijt (ed.), Focal Points in Negotiation, chapter 0, pages 125-148, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-27901-1_6
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-27901-1_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-27901-1_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.