IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-3-030-22625-1_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Validation of Net Models: Measuring Stability and Discriminatory Power

In: Targeting Uplift

Author

Listed:
  • René Michel

    (Deutsche Bank AG)

  • Igor Schnakenburg

    (DeTeCon International GmbH)

  • Tobias von Martens

    (Deutsche Bank AG)

Abstract

Measuring the quality of scoring models is a mandatory and crucial step in the data mining process. This chapter suggests key performance indicators of model quality that have been transferred from classical (gross) scoring or were specifically designed for net scoring. For model stability, the average squared deviation, a significance-based measure, and the model stability rank correlation are regarded as appropriate, whereas for discriminatory power, Qini, AUnROC, and a significance-based measure should be used. Subsequently, the validation and adjustment of uplift models over time are explained.

Suggested Citation

  • René Michel & Igor Schnakenburg & Tobias von Martens, 2019. "Validation of Net Models: Measuring Stability and Discriminatory Power," Springer Books, in: Targeting Uplift, chapter 0, pages 101-120, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-22625-1_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-22625-1_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-3-030-22625-1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.