IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-1-4020-9137-7_11.html

Comparison of RBF and SHL Neural Network Based Adaptive Control

In: Unmanned Aircraft Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ryan T. Anderson

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, Department of Aerospace Engineering)

  • Girish Chowdhary

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, Department of Aerospace Engineering)

  • Eric N. Johnson

    (Georgia Institute of Technology, Department of Aerospace Engineering)

Abstract

Modern unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are required to perform complex maneuvers while operating in increasingly uncertain environments. To meet these demands and model the system dynamics with a high degree of precision, a control system design known as neural network based model reference adaptive control (MRAC) is employed. There are currently two neural network architectures used by industry and academia as the adaptive element for MRAC; the radial basis function and single hidden layer neural network. While mathematical derivations can identify differences between the two neural networks, there have been no comparative analyses conducted on the performance characteristics for the flight controller to justify the selection of one neural network over the other. While the architecture of both neural networks contain similarities, there are several key distinctions which exhibit a noticeable impact on the control system’s overall performance. In this paper, a detailed comparison of the performance characteristics between both neural network based adaptive control approaches has been conducted in an application highly relevant to UAVs. The results and conclusions drawn from this paper will provide engineers with tangible justification for the selection of the better neural network adaptive element and thus a controller with better performance characteristics.

Suggested Citation

  • Ryan T. Anderson & Girish Chowdhary & Eric N. Johnson, 2008. "Comparison of RBF and SHL Neural Network Based Adaptive Control," Springer Books, in: Kimon P. Valavanis & Paul Oh & Les A. Piegl (ed.), Unmanned Aircraft Systems, pages 183-199, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4020-9137-7_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9137-7_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-1-4020-9137-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.