IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/sprchp/978-0-387-71607-7_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

DEA Models For Supply Chain or Multi-Stage Structure

In: Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Wade D. Cook

    (York University)

  • Liang Liang

    (University of Science and Technology of China)

  • Feng Yang

    (University of Science and Technology of China)

  • Joe Zhu

    (Worcester Polytechnic Institute)

Abstract

Standard data envelopment analysis (DEA) models cannot be used directly to measure the performance of a supply chain and its members, because of the existence of the intermediate measures connecting those members. This observation is true for any situations where DMUs contain multi-stage processes. This chapter presents several DEA-based approaches in a seller-buyer supply chain context. Some DEA models are developed under the assumption that the relationship between the seller and buyer is treated as leader-follower and cooperative, respectively. In the leader-follower (or non-cooperative) structure, the leader is first evaluated using the standard DEA model, and then the follower is evaluated by a new DEA-based model which incorporates the DEA efficiency information for the leader. In the cooperative structure, one maximizes the joint efficiency that is modeled as the average of the seller’s and buyer’s efficiency scores, and both supply chain members are evaluated simultaneously.

Suggested Citation

  • Wade D. Cook & Liang Liang & Feng Yang & Joe Zhu, 2007. "DEA Models For Supply Chain or Multi-Stage Structure," Springer Books, in: Joe Zhu & Wade D. Cook (ed.), Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis, chapter 0, pages 189-208, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-71607-7_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-71607-7_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Guan, Jiancheng & Chen, Kaihua, 2012. "Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(1), pages 102-115.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:sprchp:978-0-387-71607-7_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.