IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prochp/978-3-030-46781-4_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Designing Platforms to Support Knowledge-Intensive Organizational Work

In: Design Science Research. Cases

Author

Listed:
  • Sandeep Purao

    (Bentley University)

  • Arvind Karunakaran

    (McGill University)

Abstract

This is a story of a design science research project that started in one domain, petrochemical refineries, before extending into another, technology consulting. Across the two domains, the problem was scoped, defined and refined as one of supporting knowledge-intensive work that takes place over time and across locations with teams of specialists. Significant empirical work and design efforts in fields like knowledge management, collaborative work, and business process design have yet to provide clear paths to successful intervention in this problem. We relied on design science research (DSR) and action design research (ADR) methods as we worked to develop two context-specific solutions. One solution, SPA, used semantic analysis of operator procedures for organizations in petrochemical refining to generate meaningful instruction sets in support of collaborative work on the refinery floor. The other solution, ReKon, decomposed consulting templates into meaningful sections for technology consulting so knowledge workers could access these templates across project phases in response to new consulting assignments. Together, the two artifacts exemplify a key design principle: anchoring knowledge units, not task sequences, in concrete artifacts may improve knowledge workers’ ability to respond to emergent complexities in knowledge-intensive work. The research project revealed three primary lessons. First, the time-consuming tasks of stakeholder interaction and development of seemingly simple artifacts allowed us to surface the complexities of organizational knowledge work in these domains. Second, ongoing and intense reflection away from the project activities was necessary to appreciate the theoretical depth. Third, the messy nature of design continued to grate against the systematic approach suggested by research methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Sandeep Purao & Arvind Karunakaran, 2020. "Designing Platforms to Support Knowledge-Intensive Organizational Work," Progress in IS, in: Jan vom Brocke & Alan Hevner & Alexander Maedche (ed.), Design Science Research. Cases, pages 207-227, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-030-46781-4_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-46781-4_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zare, Fateme & Jakeman, Anthony J. & Elsawah, Sondoss & Guillaume, Joseph H.A., 2024. "Bridging practice and science in socio-environmental systems research and modelling: A design science approach," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 492(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prochp:978-3-030-46781-4_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.