IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-981-95-6415-6_127.html

Evaluating and Ranking Industry 4.0 Technologies Indicators for Agile and Resilient Business Models with MCDM

In: Entrepreneurship and Human-Centric Business Strategies for Social and Economic Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Dalia Štreimikienė

    (Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Institute of Economics and Rural Development)

  • Ahmad Bathaei

    (Lithuanian Centre for Social Sciences, Institute of Economics and Rural Development)

  • Michał Kot

    (Czestochowa University of Technology)

Abstract

Because the competition became complex and the company's uncertainty became apparent, agility and resilience are now a mandatory strategic capability for organizations seeking long-term competitive advantage in global markets. The objective of this paper is therefore to assess and rank the key Industry 4.0 technologies against their contribution to agility and resilience of the business models with special focus in EU. Using a structured Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) method, the Best–Worst Method (BWM), this research includes expert judgments to rank the six strategic drivers of cloud computing adoption, which are flexibility, scalability, integration facilitation, decision support, implementation risk, and recovery facilitation. These criteria capture the multifaceted roles that technologies play in strengthening organizations’ adaptive capacity and continuity planning. In this research, data were ranked based on five highlighted Industry 4.0 technologies (i.e., Artificial Intelligence, Big Data Analytics, Internet of Things, Blockchain, and Cyber-Physical Systems) and for 32 EU-based experts across academia and industry. Based on the analysis of the determinants, it comes that the lesser index in supporting agile and resilient business models is Big Data Analytics (BDA) and Artificial Intelligence (AI), since BDA and AI have performed way better in decision-making support and flexibility. The results contribute to theoretical knowledge and are also valuable in practice as they give a strategic pathway for technology adoption which is coherent with the key priorities of digital transformation set out by the EU. The study fills an important void in the literature by connecting the domains of digital technology assessment and organizational agility and resilience. It also provides a replicable playbook for policymakers and managers who want to direct resources toward technologies with the greatest strategic impact in rapidly moving industrial ecosystems.

Suggested Citation

  • Dalia Štreimikienė & Ahmad Bathaei & Michał Kot, 2026. "Evaluating and Ranking Industry 4.0 Technologies Indicators for Agile and Resilient Business Models with MCDM," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Singha Chaveesuk & Seungwoo Shin & Sebastian Kot & Bilal Khalid (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Human-Centric Business Strategies for Social and Economic Resilience, pages 2037-2051, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-95-6415-6_127
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-6415-6_127
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-95-6415-6_127. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.