IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-981-95-6415-6_110.html

A Comparative Analysis of Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, and Information Quality in Facebook and Whatsapp Buying Groups

In: Entrepreneurship and Human-Centric Business Strategies for Social and Economic Resilience

Author

Listed:
  • Rita Klonaridis

    (North-West University)

  • Heleneze-Tiané Lues

    (North-West University)

  • Ayanda Eva Mbonani

    (North-West University)

Abstract

Consumers are increasingly turning to Facebook and WhatsApp groups for social shopping. Existing research highlights how ease of use, platform usefulness, and information quality shape shoppers’ perceptions of platform value. By comparing two major social commerce platforms, this study offers insights to help entrepreneurs and informal traders enhance customer experience, engagement, and purchasing outcomes. This study aimed to identify differences between Facebook and WhatsApp groups in terms of their ease of use, perceived usefulness as shopping platforms, and the quality of information provided by sellers on these groups within a South African context. This study used a quantitative, descriptive research design with an electronic self-administered questionnaire completed by 174 male and female participants (ages 18–55) who had previously shopped via Facebook or WhatsApp groups. The results indicate that the ease of use and perceived usefulness of Facebook and WhatsApp groups are regarded as similar. However, significant differences emerged in perceived information quality, with Facebook groups viewed more favorably. Moreover, it was established that information quality and ease of use significantly influence the perceived usefulness of shopping from both platforms, with ease of use being the strongest contributor. Therefore, whether using Facebook or WhatsApp, sellers must ensure a simple buying process and high-quality information to keep platforms useful for consumers. On WhatsApp, this means leveraging ease of use with clear, simple group communication, while on Facebook it involves providing consistent, credible content to build trust. Future research should use longitudinal designs, include more platforms and demographics, and explore new constructs to better understand social commerce.

Suggested Citation

  • Rita Klonaridis & Heleneze-Tiané Lues & Ayanda Eva Mbonani, 2026. "A Comparative Analysis of Ease of Use, Perceived Usefulness, and Information Quality in Facebook and Whatsapp Buying Groups," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Singha Chaveesuk & Seungwoo Shin & Sebastian Kot & Bilal Khalid (ed.), Entrepreneurship and Human-Centric Business Strategies for Social and Economic Resilience, pages 1777-1790, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-95-6415-6_110
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-6415-6_110
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-95-6415-6_110. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.