IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-981-19-8485-3_21.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Assessment of Job Satisfaction in Nurses: Contributions to Health Management

In: Rethinking Management and Economics in the New 20’s

Author

Listed:
  • Cristina Costeira

    (UICISA.E; School of Health Sciences-Polytechnic of Leiria)

  • Paulo Santos-Costa

    (Nursing School of Coimbra)

  • Anabela Oliveira-Salgueiro

    (Nursing School of Coimbra)

  • Cátia Santos

    (School of Health Sciences-Polytechnic of Leiria)

  • Nelson Pais

    (IPO de Coimbra)

  • Filipa Ventura

    (Nursing School of Coimbra)

Abstract

Background: Evidence reflects that job satisfaction is an indicator of the quality of health care. Health managers and decision-makers cannot neglect its importance and should promote organizational interventions for its assessment and improvement. Objective: This study aims to (i) compare the job satisfaction experienced by nurses with the one desired (ii) identify the lowest areas of current satisfaction and (iii) reflect in areas of lowest and higher job satisfaction. Method: A descriptive study carried out in September 2021 with thirty oncology nurses, who were asked to fill out an electronic questionnaire with the professional life wheel coaching tool. This coaching diagnostic tool assesses the current satisfaction level and the desired satisfaction level from 1 to 10. The inquired areas were: salary, career progression, relationships with managers, relationships with the team, relationships with patients/family, professional environment, feeling of institutional belonging, working conditions, appreciation/recognition, and professional fulfillment. Ethical assumptions were preserved. Results: The results suggest that oncology nurses have important levels of job dissatisfaction. The lowest values of experienced job satisfaction were related to career development, while the highest were related to team relationships. Regarding the desired job satisfaction, the salary was the area presenting the least need for correction. The relationship with patients and families was identified as the area with the greatest desire for improvement. There was a weak correlation between job satisfaction and age, and job satisfaction and professional experience. Discussion and Conclusion: The relationship with the team was one of the areas identified by nurses as significant for their levels of satisfaction, revealing the importance of promoting the development of healthful and effective relationships. Promoting relationships with patients and families is also important as this area was identified as a desire for greater professional development. Health care institutions and nurse managers aiming at the promotion of job satisfaction should plan interventions focusing on the areas of lower job satisfaction and towards younger nurses, who have less experience in clinical environments. Such an approach will likely allow the nurses to feel valued and will reduce the gap between experienced and desired job satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Cristina Costeira & Paulo Santos-Costa & Anabela Oliveira-Salgueiro & Cátia Santos & Nelson Pais & Filipa Ventura, 2023. "Assessment of Job Satisfaction in Nurses: Contributions to Health Management," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Eleonora Santos & Neuza Ribeiro & Teresa Eugénio (ed.), Rethinking Management and Economics in the New 20’s, pages 471-481, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-19-8485-3_21
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-19-8485-3_21
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-981-19-8485-3_21. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.