IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-319-70377-0_57.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Learning Styles and Preferences for Different Types of Courses and Teaching of Croatian Students of Business

In: Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe

Author

Listed:
  • Bulog Ivana

    (University of Split)

  • Matić Ivan

    (University of Split)

Abstract

An important element of individuals’ learning process is his or her learning style (LS). The fact is that each of us has a different kind of intelligence and learns and prefers to be taught differently. An individual’s personality determines a preferred approach to perceiving, acquiring, and processing new information. These approaches in the literature are called LSs. LSs affect the learning outcomes of students and influence their educational development as well as their academic achievements. The knowledge about students’ LS can help them to maximize their learning outcomes. The way students learn is important not just for them and their success in education but also for teachers and the faculty providing the education. The way tasks and instructional strategies are designed can facilitate and enhance students’ learning which in turn may result in the improvement of the quality of education overall. To achieve mutual effectiveness for students and teachers, it is necessary to gain deeper insights into students’ preferred LSs. This research aims at identifying the LS preferences of Croatian students of business as well as their preferences for different types of courses and teaching (CTPs). It examines the potential relationship between these two elements of learning process. To our knowledge, there has been no research that has investigated this connection. The literature has overlooked the topic of preferences for the teaching and course types according to student’s LS preferences. Linking these two variables and analyzing their compatibility is the first step in gathering information which can help to answer the frequently asked question: how to improve the quality of learning and teaching in higher education? In order to accomplish stated purpose of the research, two inventory instruments were used: the VARK instrument to examine LS preferences and the third part (Part C) of the ASSIST questionnaire to examine students’ CTPs. VARK is a questionnaire that provides users with their LS preferences based on their perceptual modality preferences which refer to the way they extract information from their environments through the senses. It has often been employed in previous research for assessing LSs of students of business. It is simple, quick, and easy for students to understand and complete, and it is regarded by relevant literature as a reliable and quality instrument. ASSIST has also been proven to be a valuable, valid, and appropriate instrument for measuring students’ approaches to learning. The results of the survey are interesting and somewhat puzzling. They indicate the dominant LS preferences as well as dominant CTPs according to age, gender, year of study, and course of study. Some student percentages indicate that they can use more than one LS. The relationship between LS preferences and CTPs was not determined. Based on the overall findings, the research offers foundation for future research in this area. The implications of the findings are discussed in terms of learning and teaching.

Suggested Citation

  • Bulog Ivana & Matić Ivan, 2018. "Learning Styles and Preferences for Different Types of Courses and Teaching of Croatian Students of Business," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Anastasios Karasavvoglou & Srećko Goić & Persefoni Polychronidou & Pavlos Delias (ed.), Economy, Finance and Business in Southeastern and Central Europe, pages 827-843, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-70377-0_57
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-70377-0_57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-70377-0_57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.