IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-319-67101-7_20.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Use of Geological Background Reference Values for Soil Evaluation and Remediation: The Trajouce Ecopark Case-Study

In: Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies

Author

Listed:
  • Graça Brito

    (NOVA University of Lisbon)

  • Carlos Costa

    (eGiamb, Consultoria Geoambiental, Lda)

  • Daniel Vendas

    (eGiamb, Consultoria Geoambiental, Lda)

  • Susana Dias

    (TRATOLIXO – Tratamento de Resíduos Sólidos, EIM)

Abstract

2015 was proclaimed as the ‘International Year of Soils’ (IYS) at the 68th UN General Assembly. While soil is recognized as an essential, finite and non-renewable natural resource, it is increasingly degraded or irreversibly lost due to poor management and urban and infrastructure expansion, both in the EU and at a global level. Soil contamination in particular has not only negative impacts on human health and ecosystems but also on economy, by the reduction in environmental services as a result of loss of natural soil capital and costs of land rehabilitation. The number of contaminated sites in the EU may exceed half a million. However, only a few EU Member States have specific legislation on soil protection. While the European Commission decided in May 2014 to withdraw the proposal for a Soil Framework Directive, the 7th Environment Action Programme, which entered into force on 17 January 2014, recognizes that soil degradation is a serious challenge and provides that by 2020 land is managed sustainably, soil is adequately protected and the remediation of contaminated sites is in good progress in the EU. In Portugal draft legislation on the prevention of contamination and remediation of soils that seeks to eliminate major gap in the national legislative framework and comply with international commitments, was submitted for public consultation and is now being discussed. Among several innovations, for the definition of reference values for evaluation and remediation of soil, natural background values can be used instead of those adopted from the Ontario Standards [MOE (Soil, Ground Water and Sediment Standards for Use Under Part XV.1 of the Environmental Protection Act., April 15, 2011. Ministry of the Environment, 2011)], or other international standards, for the most common contaminants, if duly justified and accepted by the Environmental Portuguese Agency. This paper reports a case study in which the conducted site investigation, sampling and interpretation of results confirmed the existence of a neat relationship between the presence of vanadium and geological background of the region where the Trajouce Ecopark (TRATOLIXO) operates, which allowed to classify the soil resulting from the treatment of several areas affected by the inadequate disposal of urban solid waste as suitable for environmental rehabilitation of the site [EGIAMB (Estudo das Concentrações Naturais de Vanádio na Envolvência do Ecoparque de Trajouce. Final Report, 2014)].

Suggested Citation

  • Graça Brito & Carlos Costa & Daniel Vendas & Susana Dias, 2018. "The Use of Geological Background Reference Values for Soil Evaluation and Remediation: The Trajouce Ecopark Case-Study," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Albertina Dias & Bror Salmelin & David Pereira & Miguel Sales Dias (ed.), Modeling Innovation Sustainability and Technologies, pages 273-287, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-67101-7_20
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-67101-7_20
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-67101-7_20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.