IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-319-49559-0_44.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

All for One and One for All: A Cross-Sector Analysis of Reporting Standards

In: New Trends in Finance and Accounting

Author

Listed:
  • Tudor Oprisor

    (Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca)

  • Andrei-Razvan Crisan

    (Babes-Bolyai University of Cluj-Napoca)

Abstract

This paper aims to provide a comparative view between the private and the public sectors through the “lens” of reporting standards and question whether the differences are so pronounced to provide the necessity for distinct sets of regulations and guidelines. To achieve this, we analyze the two sectors in comparison with the use of the literature and official documents. On this ground, we give an insight on the current status of the specific sets of regulations and guidelines (on each level of information). Our findings show that the current reporting practice (taking integrated reporting into account) leads toward a diminishing in the different treatment of the two sectors (from a reporting point of view). All the constituting elements and principles of reporting standards (as well as initiatives from major standard setters) are driven toward one concise communication (the integrated report), thus reducing the gap. Also, the conceptual framework does not purposely discriminate between sectors; it treats them equally and offers implementation perspectives for all entities (by providing principles, fundamental concepts, and theoretical model).

Suggested Citation

  • Tudor Oprisor & Andrei-Razvan Crisan, 2017. "All for One and One for All: A Cross-Sector Analysis of Reporting Standards," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: David Procházka (ed.), New Trends in Finance and Accounting, chapter 0, pages 473-484, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-49559-0_44
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-49559-0_44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-49559-0_44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.