IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-319-28419-4_23.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

EEG Frontal Asymmetry Related to Pleasantness of Olfactory Stimuli in Young Subjects

In: Selected Issues in Experimental Economics

Author

Listed:
  • Gianluca Flumeri

    (BrainSigns srl)

  • Maria Trinidad Herrero

    (University of Murcia)

  • Arianna Trettel

    (BrainSigns srl)

  • Patrizia Cherubino

    (IULM University
    Via Gigi Peronace)

  • Anton Giulio Maglione

    (BrainSigns srl)

  • Alfredo Colosimo

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

  • Elisabetta Moneta

    (The Agricultural Research Council – Food and nutrition Research Center (CRA-NUT))

  • Marina Peparaio

    (The Agricultural Research Council – Food and nutrition Research Center (CRA-NUT))

  • Fabio Babiloni

    (Sapienza University of Rome)

Abstract

It is widely known, in neuroscientific literature, that the brain prefrontal cortex activity asymmetry is closely linked with the pleasantness emotion experienced by the subject during a sensorial stimulation. Thus, from the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal it is possible to estimate the approach/withdrawal index, and this index has been largely investigated and validated in scientific literature, regarding visual and acoustic stimuli. In this work, we present an innovative study aimed to prove, in a systematic way, that such brain AW index is actually correlated with the “pleasant” or “no-pleasant” perception also of olfactory stimuli, conveniently produced by standardised methods in the sensory specific scientific literature. In particular, we recorded the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal from a group, gender balanced, of 24 healthy and no-smokers subjects during the perception of ten different smells, presented by means of the “Screening test-odour identification” set (Sniffin’ sticks, Burghart). The cerebral AW indexes of all the subjects, for each odorous stimulus, were compared with the appreciation numeric score assessed by the subject during the experiment, by performing a statistical correlation test. Findings show that it is possible to evaluate the pleasantness or no-pleasantness of odorous substances by means of the analysis of EEG signals collected during the presentation of such substances, making way for new applications of such measure kind in experimental environments more and more ecological, as the typical ones of the marketing research areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Gianluca Flumeri & Maria Trinidad Herrero & Arianna Trettel & Patrizia Cherubino & Anton Giulio Maglione & Alfredo Colosimo & Elisabetta Moneta & Marina Peparaio & Fabio Babiloni, 2016. "EEG Frontal Asymmetry Related to Pleasantness of Olfactory Stimuli in Young Subjects," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Kesra Nermend & Małgorzata Łatuszyńska (ed.), Selected Issues in Experimental Economics, edition 1, chapter 0, pages 373-381, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-28419-4_23
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-28419-4_23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mateusz Piwowarski & Katarzyna Gadomska-Lila & Kesra Nermend, 2021. "Cognitive Neuroscience Methods in Enhancing Health Literacy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-19, May.
    2. Ahmed H. Alsharif & Nor Zafir Md Salleh & Rohaizat Baharun & Alharthi Rami Hashem E & Aida Azlina Mansor & Javed Ali & Alhamzah F. Abbas, 2021. "Neuroimaging Techniques in Advertising Research: Main Applications, Development, and Brain Regions and Processes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-25, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-319-28419-4_23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.