Author
Listed:
- Ahmad Kaab Omeir
(Vilnius University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration)
- Deimante Vasiliauskaite
(Vilnius University, Business School)
- Wenting Meng
(Vilnius University, Business School)
Abstract
Climate risk management in central banks has gained increasing relevance due to the financial implications of climate change on asset prices and economic stability. This study examines the governance structures of climate-related financial disclosures within Euro Area central banks that manage foreign reserves, focusing on the role of board oversight in integrating sustainability considerations into investment strategies. The literature review highlights the evolving nature of central banks’ mandates, which are moving beyond traditional financial stability objectives to incorporate climate risks into their decision-making processes. Prior research highlights the impact of board members’ values on the adoption of climate policy and the varying degrees of governance structures that support sustainability goals. However, gaps remain in understanding how governance frameworks impact the effectiveness of climate risk management and financial disclosures. This study employs a Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) methodology to evaluate the effectiveness of governance in managing climate-related financial risks among 18 European central banks. The research evaluates board-level oversight mechanisms, disclosure transparency, and the integration of climate considerations into foreign reserves management. A governance index is developed based on structured scoring criteria, normalizing central banks’ performance in climate-related risk oversight. The findings reveal significant heterogeneity in governance practices. Leading institutions, such as Banca d’Italia, Banque de France, and De Nederlandsche Bank, demonstrate structured governance frameworks with explicit climate oversight, dedicated committees, and regular board-level reporting. In contrast, some central banks exhibit weaker governance structures, with limited engagement in climate risk assessment and the integration of sustainability. The results highlight the need for standardized governance frameworks and enhanced regulatory alignment to ensure effective climate risk management. This paper contributes to the field of similar scientific literature by providing a comparative governance assessment of climate-related financial disclosures in central banking. It offers insights into best practices and policy recommendations to strengthen board oversight and enhance climate risk resilience in financial institutions.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-032-19276-9_31. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.