IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-032-16432-2_11.html

Study of the Impact of Lean Philosophy on Process Improvement and Sustainability in Companies: Case Study

In: Challenges and Innovation Opportunities in the Context of Sustainability, Industries 4.0 and 5.0

Author

Listed:
  • Eduarda Duarte

    (ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto)

  • Luís Fonseca

    (ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto
    INEGI - Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, LAETA/INEGI)

  • Olívia McDermott

    (University of Galway, College of Science & Engineering)

  • José Dinis-Carvalho

    (University of Minho, Department of Production and Systems)

  • José Carlos de Sá

    (ISEP, Polytechnic of Porto
    INEGI - Institute of Science and Innovation in Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, LAETA/INEGI)

Abstract

Currently, we face significant global challenges such as climate change, resource scarcity, and the growing awareness of organizations’ social and environmental responsibility. In this context, the pursuit of sustainability has become an undeniable priority. This is where lean philosophy comes in, a fundamental approach to address these challenges by promoting not only operational efficiency but also the adoption of more sustainable practices. The goal of lean philosophy is to improve production processes, reduce waste, and increase value delivered to the customer. However, as environmental and social concerns gain prominence, this philosophy has been adapted to incorporate sustainability principles, aiming to minimize the negative impact of companies’ operations on the environment and society. This study focused on investigating how the application of lean philosophy can contribute to process improvement and the promotion of sustainability in a company, which is essentially dedicated to the production of conveyor belts. Using the DMAIC methodology (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control), a structured approach was adopted to identify, analyze, and resolve the operational challenges faced by the company. Throughout the research, it became evident that lean philosophy strategies not only improved the production processes but also had a significant impact on its operational sustainability. The implementation of lean tools, such as the VSM (Value Stream Mapping), 5S, A3 report, Standard Work, Visual Management, among others, not only allowed for waste reduction and efficiency improvement but also enabled the minimization of the environmental and social impact of the company’s operations. This integrated approach demonstrated that lean philosophy can be a powerful ally in the pursuit of more sustainable business practices. By aligning operational efficiency objectives with sustainability goals, companies can not only improve their competitiveness in the market but also play an active role in building a more sustainable future for future generations.

Suggested Citation

  • Eduarda Duarte & Luís Fonseca & Olívia McDermott & José Dinis-Carvalho & José Carlos de Sá, 2026. "Study of the Impact of Lean Philosophy on Process Improvement and Sustainability in Companies: Case Study," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Teresa Morgado & João Calado & José Carlos de Sá & António Abreu & Ivan Galvão (ed.), Challenges and Innovation Opportunities in the Context of Sustainability, Industries 4.0 and 5.0, chapter 11, pages 145-157, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-032-16432-2_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-16432-2_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-032-16432-2_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.