IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-032-13384-7_24.html

The Agency Theory and State-Owned Companies: Evidence from South Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Khazamula Stephen Shiburi

    (University of Johannesburg)

  • Benjamin Marx

    (University of Johannesburg)

  • Rozanne Smiith

    (University of Johannesburg)

Abstract

The literature is replete with studies using the agency theory to examine the relationship between shareholders and executives of private entities. However, few researchers have applied the agency theory to state-owned entities. Against this background, this study examines key agency theory issues within schedule two state-owned entities in South Africa, including identifying agents and principals, information asymmetry, conflicts of interest, and differences in risk attitudes. The study approach takes the form of a snowballing systematic literature review of articles published in peer-reviewed journals that were indexed in the Scopus databases. This study finds that South African citizens are the principals of schedule two state-owned entities, whilst the government and executives are agents. In addition, there is evidence supporting conflicting interests, information asymmetry, and differential risk attitudes between the government, executives, and the public in the South African schedule two state-owned entities. This study provides evidence of agency problems in South African schedule two state-owned entities, offering insights for policymakers on governance reforms to enhance accountability and efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Khazamula Stephen Shiburi & Benjamin Marx & Rozanne Smiith, 2026. "The Agency Theory and State-Owned Companies: Evidence from South Africa," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics,, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-032-13384-7_24
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-032-13384-7_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-032-13384-7_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.