IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-031-94518-2_4.html

The Adoption of AI Tools in Doctoral Studies: An Extended TAM Framework

In: Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Global Financial Crisis on Development in Africa

Author

Listed:
  • Lahsen Oubdi

    (ENCG Agadir, Ibn Zohr University)

  • Oumaima El-Mekkaoui

    (ENCG Agadir, Ibn Zohr University)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used in various industries, including academic research. This study examines the drivers that influence PhD researchers’ adoption of AI academic tools, using the technology acceptance model (TAM). We propose an extended version of the basic TAM framework, incorporating perceived benefits, self-efficacy, and perceived trust in addition to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Structural equation modeling (SEM) is used to test the model's validity. Our findings indicate that perceived usefulness positively affects PhD researchers’ attitudes toward using academic AI tools, while perceived ease of use, self-efficacy, perceived benefits, and perceived trust do not. We also found that PhD researchers’ attitudes toward using academic AI tools predict their behavioral intention, which ultimately determines their actual behavior. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study of its kind in this area.

Suggested Citation

  • Lahsen Oubdi & Oumaima El-Mekkaoui, 2026. "The Adoption of AI Tools in Doctoral Studies: An Extended TAM Framework," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Shani D. Carter & Andrea Smith-Hunter & Laura Best (ed.), Impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and the Global Financial Crisis on Development in Africa, chapter 0, pages 57-78, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-94518-2_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-94518-2_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-94518-2_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.