IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-031-84885-8_52.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Auditor Independence: Does Audit Engagement Lead Partner Rotation Matter?

In: Impacting Society Positively Through Technology in Accounting and Business Processes

Author

Listed:
  • Eghosa Godwin Inneh

    (University of Johannesburg)

Abstract

Following the Enron financial scandal, several mechanisms were introduced, including audit rotation, to improve audit independence and financial reporting quality. Audit rotation is based on two perspectives: audit firm and partner rotation. Most countries have adopted one of the two audit rotations to improve audit quality. However, few countries have adopted both audit mechanisms, including Nigeria. In Nigeria, several studies subsisted on audit firm rotation, neglecting the audit partner rotation, even though humans may be responsible for the impairment of audit quality rather than the firm. Our study filled the gap by examining the effect of audit partner tenure on financial reporting quality to determine whether audit partner rotation matters. In answering the study’s objective, data was collected from the financial report of Nigerian Deposit Money Banks using a census study and estimated using the Ordinary Least Square (OLS). The result showed that auditors’ independence is compromised with an elongated audit tenure and invariably results in a lower audit quality. The study aligned with the fresh eye hypothesis and supported the mandatory audit partner regulation to minimise the familiarity threat from a close auditor–client association arising from a long audit partner’s tenure.

Suggested Citation

  • Eghosa Godwin Inneh, 2025. "Auditor Independence: Does Audit Engagement Lead Partner Rotation Matter?," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Tankiso Moloi (ed.), Impacting Society Positively Through Technology in Accounting and Business Processes, pages 957-971, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-84885-8_52
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-84885-8_52
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-84885-8_52. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.