IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-031-50559-1_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Do You Recommend This? Exploring the Role of Presence, Self-efficacy, and Usability in the Willingness to Adopt and Recommend a VR Application

In: XR and Metaverse

Author

Listed:
  • Marnix S. Gisbergen

    (BUAS - Breda University of Applied Sciences)

  • Shima R. Rashnoodi

    (BUAS - Breda University of Applied Sciences)

  • Miruna Doicaru

    (BUAS - Breda University of Applied Sciences)

  • Fabio Campos

    (BUAS - Breda University of Applied Sciences)

Abstract

Despite the market potential of many XR applications, numerous companies struggle to produce applications able to reach widespread adoption. Several studies indicate a connection between the willingness to recommend an XR application and the adoption of that application. However, the main variables involved in the willingness to recommend have not been studied much within the domain of XR. In this study, we focused on the willingness to recommend a Virtual Reality (VR) emergency training. General practitioners and elderly-care students used a VR training application, after which we measured XR assessment dimensions, such as presence, usability, attention, pleasure, learning, and adoption. The results revealed three dimensions able to explain 75% of the recommendation willingness: usability, usefulness, and joy. These dimensions can be used by researchers and developers to continuously and consistently compare XR training applications on market potential and decide to launch or first improve an XR application.

Suggested Citation

  • Marnix S. Gisbergen & Shima R. Rashnoodi & Miruna Doicaru & Fabio Campos, 2024. "Do You Recommend This? Exploring the Role of Presence, Self-efficacy, and Usability in the Willingness to Adopt and Recommend a VR Application," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: M. Claudia tom Dieck & Timothy Jung & Yen-Soon Kim (ed.), XR and Metaverse, pages 3-15, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-50559-1_1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-50559-1_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-50559-1_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.