IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/prbchp/978-3-031-05728-1_9.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Consumers’ Online Brand Related Activities in the Context of Their Motives and Outcomes: Case Study of the Social Network YouTube

In: Advances in Digital Marketing and eCommerce

Author

Listed:
  • L’udovít Nastišin

    (University of Presov)

  • Richard Fedorko

    (University of Presov)

Abstract

This study analyzes consumers’ online brand related activities (COBRAs) on the social network YouTube. These activities include consuming, contributing and creating brand-related content. The goal was to assess the effects of COBRAs on motives and the outcome for the brand in the form of word-of-mouth. The paper analyzed the primary data of a standard-designed questionnaire filled in by 346 respondents. In order to meet the goal, the paper employed business factor analysis and subsequently also PLS PM modelling equations. The significance of the selected trajectories analyzed was observed in the case of all four motives and also in terms of the impact on the brand in the form of word-of-mouth. The results were also interpreted in the context of the existing research. The analysis showed that the most effective motives with a significant trajectory for all three types of COBRAs are social interaction and remuneration. The results of our findings are among the first to confirm this concept on the social network YouTube.

Suggested Citation

  • L’udovít Nastišin & Richard Fedorko, 2022. "Consumers’ Online Brand Related Activities in the Context of Their Motives and Outcomes: Case Study of the Social Network YouTube," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Francisco J. Martínez-López & Luis F. Martinez (ed.), Advances in Digital Marketing and eCommerce, pages 65-73, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-05728-1_9
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05728-1_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-05728-1_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.