Author
Abstract
In the last years with the affirmation of the Theory of Change (ToC—Connel and Kunisch in New approaches to evaluating community initiatives 2:1–16, Connell and Kubisch, New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives 2:1–16, 1998), a lot of tools for the evaluation of projects having social relevance have been developed. The need to measure their impact has led to leave the use of traditional qualitative measurement instruments joints for quantitative tools, which calculate the effectiveness of the resources employed and the generated impact by social projects (Anderson in The community builder's approach to Theory of Change, Anderson, A.A., (2006). The community builder's approach to Theory of Change.). Among them, recently it is paid attention on the Social Return on Investment (SROI—Lingane and Olsen in California management review 46:116–135, Lingane and Olsen, California Management Review 46:116–135, 2004), a model to account for created value. It includes not only the return of investments but also the benefits for the broader public in the social, economic and environmental spheres. The research aim is to verify and calculate SROI as a valid tool to measure the impact generated by social projects in transitional countries, especially those of health international cooperation. Indeed, the economic quantification of the SROI rate appears as an important element to improve reporting and accountability both to the lender, the gesture and the users. The case study has been identified as appropriate methodology for conducting this research (Yin 2003; Eisenhardt in Academy of Management Review 14:532–550, Eisenhardt, Academy of Management Review 14:532–550, 1989). The project ‘Introducing Health Information System (IHIS): a modern approach to transparency and accountability in the Albanian public health’ conducted by the Tuscany Region resulted relevant for the involvement of different actors and its action in a transition country as Albania. This project was realized from 2014 to 2016 using financing from IADSA (Italian Albanian Debt for Development Swap Agreement) to support the Albanian government in the NHS technological and accountant development. Now it’s possible to adequately observe the generated impact 5 years after the conclusion of IHIS project. The necessary data for the calculation of SROI was collected by desk analysis of project's documents and reports and the conduction of interviews and focus groups to a specimen of involved stakeholders. Results show the good capability of SROI to quantitatively evaluate the impact produced by a health international cooperation project, also if complex and articulated as that studied. In particular, the SROI rate of this project is 9.4, an optimal rate (for 1.00€ invested, the project generated an economic impact of 9.40€). Therefore, it is demonstrated the optimal use of the allocated resources obtaining a strong effective impact in the Albanian health care system and on the network of involved stakeholders. Another important aspect is the reinforcement of results dissemination in the society, for the simplicity and easy comprehension of the SROI rate and the internal restitution promoted by SROI analysis. So SROI proves as a good instrument both to measure and to share the economic value of generated impact.
Suggested Citation
Martina Giusti & Niccolò Persiani & Michele Luca & Maria Josè Caldes, 2022.
"The Social Return on Investment (SROI) for Evaluation of the Impact in International Cooperation Health Project in Albania: A Case Study,"
Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Pantelis Sklias & Persefoni Polychronidou & Anastasios Karasavvoglou & Victoria Pistikou & Nikolaos (ed.), Business Development and Economic Governance in Southeastern Europe, pages 73-91,
Springer.
Handle:
RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-05351-1_4
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05351-1_4
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
search for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:prbchp:978-3-031-05351-1_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.