IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-642-33371-2_8.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing Communities Design: A Cross Case Analysis

In: Designing Organizational Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Francesca Cabiddu

    (University of Cagliari)

  • Manuel Castriotta

    (University of Cagliari)

  • Maria Chiara Di Guardo

    (University of Cagliari)

  • Paola Floreddu

    (University of Cagliari)

Abstract

While a great amount of literature has focused on the effects of open innovation and crowdsourcing strategy on firms’ competition and generation of ideas, we know little about how to design an IT artifact to manage the supporting of creativity among on line communities. Defining an interpretative framework which is based on the Design Theory concept, this paper aims to contribute to this body of knowledge by means of a cross-case study, focused on the design evaluation of two crowdsourcing-supporting IT platforms. We develop a theoretical framework for crowdsourcing communities, aimed to identify how the design characteristics shape the competition to generate new ideas, thereby influencing the crowdsourcing strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Francesca Cabiddu & Manuel Castriotta & Maria Chiara Di Guardo & Paola Floreddu, 2013. "Open Innovation and Crowdsourcing Communities Design: A Cross Case Analysis," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Richard Baskerville & Marco De Marco & Paolo Spagnoletti (ed.), Designing Organizational Systems, edition 127, pages 143-155, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-642-33371-2_8
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33371-2_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leimeister, Jan Marco & Zogaj, Shkodran, 2013. "Neue Arbeitsorganisation durch Crowdsourcing: Eine Literaturstudie," Arbeitspapiere 287, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    2. Wenbo Guo & Jing Betty Feng & Brad McKenna & Pengzhu Zhang, 2017. "Inter-organizational governance and trilateral trust building: a case study of crowdsourcing-based open innovation in China," Asian Business & Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 16(3), pages 187-207, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-642-33371-2_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.