IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/lnichp/978-3-319-38974-5_24.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Encouraging Vaccination Behavior Through Online Social Media

In: Blurring the Boundaries Through Digital Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • David J. Langley

    (TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
    University of Groningen)

  • Remco Wijn

    (TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research)

  • Sacha Epskamp

    (University of Amsterdam)

  • Riet Bork

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

We explore the suitability of online social media (OSM) for influencing the public’s decision-making process regarding a vaccination to protect girls against HPV, a virus associated with cervical cancer. Parents of girls in the target cohort were invited to online discussion forums where they could discuss their opinions on the vaccination. They were exposed to promotion of the vaccination in one of four different ways, and coming from one of two different sources, i.e., peers or government health representatives. Following the health belief model (HBM), these messages served as cues to action. Using a novel network analysis approach, we find that the HBM does not adequately account for influence via OSM. Specifically we show that vaccination decisions are not taken in social isolation, a fact thus far ignored by various forms of the HBM. Implications for studies assessing the use of online channels for health communication are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • David J. Langley & Remco Wijn & Sacha Epskamp & Riet Bork, 2016. "Encouraging Vaccination Behavior Through Online Social Media," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fabrizio D'Ascenzo & Massimo Magni & Alessandra Lazazzara & Stefano Za (ed.), Blurring the Boundaries Through Digital Innovation, pages 307-318, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-319-38974-5_24
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-38974-5_24
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:lnichp:978-3-319-38974-5_24. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.