IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/innchp/978-3-319-47949-1_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

University Incubators May Be Socially Valuable, but How Effective Are They? A Case Study on Business Incubators at Universities

In: Entrepreneurial Universities

Author

Listed:
  • Dag Bennett

    (London South Bank University)

  • Diana Pérez-Bustamante Yábar

    (Rey Juan Carlos University)

  • José Ramón Saura

    (Rey Juan Carlos University)

Abstract

To counter the high failure rate of small entrepreneurial start-up companies, many universities set up business incubators that nurture start-ups until they are prepared to stand on their own. There are many different types of incubator, and while the evidence of their success is inconsistent, some research suggests that they do succeed in one of their primary goals because start-ups that begin in incubators have a higher survival rate (c.f. J Technol Transf 48(5):692–710, 2004) compared to non-incubator companies. Traditional definitions of incubators (J Technol Transf 29(1):55–82, 2004) generally include: (a) Shared office space rented at favourable rates, (b) Shared support services that reduce overhead costs, (c) Professional business support, advice and mentoring, and (d) Professional and trade networking. While each of these aspects has been studied by academics, the general consensus is that the most important factor for start-up success is the final factor—organized networking (Int J Entrepreneur Innovat Manage 4(2–3):248–270, 2004). Recent work has shifted the focus of research on the role played by incubators as a mechanism for embedding a company within networks, recognizing that much of the entrepreneurial literature stresses that access to networks plays a crucial role for start-ups and small companies. In recent years, the business world has seen major changes in the way that organizations manage their network interactions and interactions with customers. One of the main factors in this change is new technology and data transmission capabilities. However little research has yet looked at networking and cooperation activities within incubators or how entrepreneurs use these technology-enabled networks to support development and growth. The aim of this chapter is to examine non-profit university-based incubators focusing on their role in business networking and cooperative activities. The study is exploratory and focuses on incubators at two large public universities in Spain and the UK. The main contribution of this chapter is to confirm that effectiveness assessment of incubators is so far un-systematic. This is dangerous because the lack of rigorous assessment tools and methodologies feeds the uncertainty surrounding business incubator effectiveness and ultimately threatens their ability to make meaningful contributions to the success of the companies they nurture.

Suggested Citation

  • Dag Bennett & Diana Pérez-Bustamante Yábar & José Ramón Saura, 2017. "University Incubators May Be Socially Valuable, but How Effective Are They? A Case Study on Business Incubators at Universities," Innovation, Technology, and Knowledge Management, in: Marta Peris-Ortiz & Jaime Alonso Gómez & José M. Merigó-Lindahl & Carlos Rueda-Armengot (ed.), Entrepreneurial Universities, chapter 0, pages 165-177, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-47949-1_11
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47949-1_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Arta Antonovica & Javier Esteban Curiel & Beatriz Rodríguez Herráez, 2023. "Factors that determine the degree of fulfilment of expectations for entrepreneurs from the business incubator programmes," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 261-291, March.
    2. Sohail, Kanza & Belitski, Maksim & Castro Christiansen, Liza, 2023. "Developing business incubation process frameworks: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    3. Ana Reyes-Menendez & José Ramón Saura & Cesar Alvarez-Alonso, 2018. "Understanding #WorldEnvironmentDay User Opinions in Twitter: A Topic-Based Sentiment Analysis Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, November.
    4. Nathasit Gerdsri & Boonkiart Iewwongcharoen & Kittichai Rajchamaha & Nisit Manotungvorapun & Jakapong Pongthanaisawan & Watcharin Witthayaweerasak, 2021. "Capability Assessment toward Sustainable Development of Business Incubators: Framework and Experience Sharing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:innchp:978-3-319-47949-1_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.