IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/eclchp/978-981-97-2692-9_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Stratification and Diversification in the Legal Profession

In: The Japanese Legal Profession in Transition

Author

Listed:
  • Masayuki Murayama

    (Meiji University)

Abstract

Justice System Reform has increased the number of lawyers significantly. Although the Justice System Reform Council’s recommendations were not fully realized, the increase of the lawyer population brought stratification of law firms and diversification of legal practice. The Big Five firms emerged as the largest business law firms attracting best Legal Training and Research Institute graduates. For individual clients, mass process law firms began to advertise on TV and the Internet. Traffic accidents and family matters appeared as the major focused fields. The division of legal practice for individuals and for corporations is becoming clear but many law firms do both types of work. The majority of firms other than solo practitioners have cost sharing arrangements. Income differences are large among lawyers. Lawyers began to advertise their services as a method of obtaining new clients, changing themselves from “profession” to “legal service business”. The number of in-house lawyers has increased in this century. Most in-house lawyers are now assigned to law departments. The growth of business law firms and that of law departments went side by side and expanded the business law field. New temporal career paths emerged between law firms and national ministries.

Suggested Citation

  • Masayuki Murayama, 2024. "Stratification and Diversification in the Legal Profession," Economics, Law, and Institutions in Asia Pacific, in: Masayuki Murayama (ed.), The Japanese Legal Profession in Transition, chapter 0, pages 1-63, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-97-2692-9_1
    DOI: 10.1007/978-981-97-2692-9_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-97-2692-9_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.