Author
Abstract
Investment screening has become a popular tool in “derisking” efforts from the People's Republic of China (China) and protecting strategic interests from Chinese influence or acquisition through investment. A notable example of such an investment screening mechanism is the National Security and Investment (NSI) Act 2021 in the United Kingdom (UK). The NSI Act allows the government to screen both foreign and domestic investments in a “qualifying” entity or asset for national security risks. If risk is discovered, the UK government can issue orders to mitigate national security risks. These orders can vary from imposing performance conditions on the acquisition to completely blocking the acquisition. Seven deals have been blocked or reversed so far under the NSI Act, either with a Chinese or Russian connection. This chapter will focus on 5 cases with a Chinese connection that enable examination of the NSI Act’s interaction with the UK’s investment treaty regime. These cases involve direct acquisitions by mainland Chinese investors as well as indirect acquisitions through non-Chinese companies based in Hong Kong and the Netherlands. Given the huge network of international investment agreements (IIAs) signed by the UK, a conflict may arise between the UK’s drive towards national security and its obligations towards investors as a host State under its IIAs. This chapter will assess whether risk for such a conflict exists and, if yes, how the UK should respond. The first part of the chapter will briefly examine the details of the NSI Act and the orders issued under it. The second part will examine whether these cases fall under the scope of a UK IIA. If yes, it will explore if there is a risk that the investment screening orders violate UK’s obligations as a host state and whether the UK can justify its actions under international investment treaty law. The chapter will then conclude with broad lessons that can be derived from the UK’s example. It will also highlight some of the best practices the UK has already adopted (e.g., its country-neutral design of the NSI Act and its approach in the UK-Australia FTA). Further, the UK’s investment screening mechanism and national security approach will be contextualised within the broader discussion on investment screening and investment treaty law.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
options:
1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's
web page
whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a
for a similarly titled item that would be
available.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:eclchp:978-981-95-6996-0_7. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.