IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/csrchp/978-3-319-73503-0_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Examining the Interplay of Social and Market Logics in Hybrid Business Models: A Case Study of Australian B Corps

In: Sustainable Business Models

Author

Listed:
  • Wendy Stubbs

    (Monash University)

Abstract

Traditional approaches to sustainabilitySustainability Sustainable business Values Business models , such as philanthropy, corporate social responsibility, and product innovationInnovation are insufficient to radically transform business and society toward genuine, substantive sustainable development. New hybrid business models are emerging that employ market tactics to address sustainable development issues. B Corps are a hybrid organizationHybrid organization exemplar, blending traditionally for-profitFor-profit practices with traditionally non-profit practices to address social and/or environmental issues. This chapter provides insights into how B Corps integrate for-profitFor-profit (market logic) and for-purposePurpose For-purpose (social logicSocial logic) considerations into their business models, drawing on interviews with 15 Australian B Corps. The research study found that social and market logics are strongly integrated in some areas (e.g., mission, recruitment and marketing) but trying to balance these two logics has created tensionsTensions and conflict in other areas (e.g., ownership structure, performance measurement, sales and distribution, product designDesign and development). The findings emphasize the importance of creating a common organizational identityOrganizational identity that strikes a balance between the logics to moderate conflict and one logic dominating over another. The B Corps are attempting to do this by instantiating the market and social logicsSocial logic in their missionsMission, recruitment and socialization practices (remuneration, communication and training practices).

Suggested Citation

  • Wendy Stubbs, 2018. "Examining the Interplay of Social and Market Logics in Hybrid Business Models: A Case Study of Australian B Corps," CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance, in: Lars Moratis & Frans Melissen & Samuel O. Idowu (ed.), Sustainable Business Models, chapter 0, pages 63-84, Springer.
  • Handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-73503-0_4
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-73503-0_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Giorgio Mion, 2020. "Organizations with Impact? A Study on Italian Benefit Corporations Reporting Practices and Reporting Quality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Elsa Diez-Busto & Lidia Sanchez-Ruiz & Ana Fernandez-Laviada, 2021. "The B Corp Movement: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Bruna Carvalho & Arnim Wiek & Barry Ness, 2022. "Can B Corp certification anchor sustainability in SMEs?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(1), pages 293-304, January.
    4. Sciarelli Mauro & Cosimato Silvia & Landi Giovanni, 2020. "Benefit Corporations Approach to Environmental, Social and Governance Disclosure: A Focus on Italy," Entrepreneurship Research Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:csrchp:978-3-319-73503-0_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.