IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/spr/adspcp/978-3-662-04546-6_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Scaling Knowledge Production: How Significant is the Region?

In: Knowledge, Complexity and Innovation Systems

Author

Listed:
  • Arnoud Lagendijk

    (University of Nijmegen)

Abstract

Territoriality is an important dimension of knowledge production and application. Despite the ethereal nature of the product itself, knowledge is thought to originate from, and be anchored to, particular places. Over recent decades various studies have focused on and explored the spatial dimension of knowledge production. This includes work on national and regional innovation systems, on ‘innovative milieu’ and spatial clusters, or what Moulaert and Sekia (1999) call ‘Territorial Innovation Models’. These studies have shaped a perspective that stands in marked contrast to the notion of ‘footloose’ knowledge that travels at the speed of light through the world’s electronic highways. So, for knowledge production like for other forms of production, space still seems to make a difference.

Suggested Citation

  • Arnoud Lagendijk, 2001. "Scaling Knowledge Production: How Significant is the Region?," Advances in Spatial Science, in: Manfred M. Fischer & Josef Fröhlich (ed.), Knowledge, Complexity and Innovation Systems, chapter 5, pages 79-100, Springer.
    • Handle: RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-662-04546-6_5
    DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04546-6_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Philip Cooke, 2004. "Life Sciences Clusters and Regional Science Policy," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 41(5-6), pages 1113-1131, May.
    2. Borje Johansson & Hans Loof, 2008. "Innovation Activities Explained By Firm Attributes And Location," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 533-552.
    3. Koschatzky, Knut & Lo, Vivien, 2007. "Methodological framework for cluster analyses," Working Papers "Firms and Region" R1/2007, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (ISI).
    4. Martijn J. Smit & Maria A. Abreu & Henri L.F. Groot, 2015. "Micro-evidence on the determinants of innovation in the Netherlands: The relative importance of absorptive capacity and agglomeration externalities," Papers in Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 94(2), pages 249-272, June.
    5. Börje Johansson & Hans Lööf & Amy Rade Olsson, 2005. "Firm location, Corporate Structure, R&D Investment, Innovation and Productivity," ERSA conference papers ersa05p108, European Regional Science Association.
    6. João Lopes & Mário Franco, 2019. "Review About Regional Development Networks: an Ecosystem Model Proposal," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 10(1), pages 275-297, March.
    7. Fritsch, Michael, 2003. "Do regional systems of innovation matter?," Freiberg Working Papers 2003/03, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration.
    8. Iris Wanzenböck & Thomas Scherngell & Thomas Brenner, 2014. "Embeddedness of regions in European knowledge networks: a comparative analysis of inter-regional R&D collaborations, co-patents and co-publications," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 53(2), pages 337-368, September.
    9. João Nuno Morais Lopes & Luís Farinha, 2018. "Measuring the Performance of Innovation and Entrepreneurship Networks," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 9(2), pages 402-423, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:spr:adspcp:978-3-662-04546-6_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.