IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/psitcp/978-1-137-48987-6_1.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Statute Staple and Trade Finance in Later Medieval England

In: Credit and Trade in Later Medieval England, 1353-1532

Author

Listed:
  • Richard Goddard

    (University of Nottingham)

Abstract

Credit was ubiquitous in later medieval society. All medieval trade depended upon credit—the deferred part-payment for goods sold or advances for future delivery of goods. John Gower, the late fourteenth-century poet and moralist, certainly recognises in the above quote that merchants depended upon debt and perceptively identified the fragility of a commercial system that hinged upon credit. Chaucer, in a rather more positive tone, likewise clearly identifies the inseparability of merchants, buying and selling, and credit. The use of credit to purchase goods permeated all levels of later medieval society from the greatest magnates, like the Earl of Shrewsbury—buying goods on credit from a London mercer—and the Earl of Atholl in Scotland—purchasing merchandise from the owner of a tavern in Cock Row (Cokrowe), Norwich—to peasants, such as the shepherd John Rede of Soham (Cambridgeshire), who, at his death, was still owed 31s 11d in unpaid debts—and the husbandman, John Bygge of Stortford (Hertfordshire), who had purchased £6-worth of goods on credit from a haberdasher and a fishmonger in London. Credit was a pivotal component of English domestic trade. Wool merchants like John Heritage used credit to fund the various stages of their wool businesses. Many credit agreements were informal or oral, but by the fourteenth century, high-value debts were often documented and enrolled in special debt courts known as Staple courts. In 1423, Robert Belle, a merchant of Newcastle upon Tyne, travelled nearly 500 km to London and borrowed £40—deferred payment for goods he had bought—from William Stockdale, a draper of London. The amount was to be repaid eight months later, giving Belle time to sell the goods back in Newcastle and still have time to return to London and repay the money he owed. The agreement was enrolled at the Staple court in Westminster. This work examines the role of credit and debt agreements like this one in English trade between 1353 and 1532. This was a period of transformation, not least for the English economy, associated with climatic change, high mortality, endemic warfare, economic recession and bullion famines, all of which impacted upon trade and the merchants, like those described by Gower and Chaucer, men like Belle and Stockdale, who undertook it. The principal form of evidence used is the records of the Statute Staple, a royally sanctioned debt registration system which provided for the efficient recovery defaulted debts.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard Goddard, 2016. "The Statute Staple and Trade Finance in Later Medieval England," Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance, in: Credit and Trade in Later Medieval England, 1353-1532, chapter 1, pages 1-47, Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Handle: RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-1-137-48987-6_1
    DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-48987-6_1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Volckart, Oliver, 2021. "Trade in coinage, Gresham's Law, and the drive to monetary unification: the Holy Roman Empire, 1519-59," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 109885, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    2. Volckart, Oliver, 2021. "Trade in coinage, Gresham's Law, and the drive to monetary unification: the Holy Roman Empire, 1519-59," Economic History Working Papers 109885, London School of Economics and Political Science, Department of Economic History.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-1-137-48987-6_1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.