IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/pal/psitcp/978-1-137-37155-3_5.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

The Case of the Soap Boilers

In: Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt

Author

Listed:
  • D’Maris Coffman

    (University of Cambridge)

Abstract

Despite the conceptual similarities between the royal imposts of the 1630s and the industrial excises of the 1640s and 1650s, these fiscal exactions receive separate treatment in the scholarly literature. The ‘Soap Makers Complaint’ of 1650 offers an opportunity to view disputes about the excise on soap through the lens of the controversies attendant to the earlier soap patents. Rather than offering evidence for generalised resistance to the excise by humble artisans, the ongoing pamphlet war between rival companies of soap boilers involved some of the most powerful men in London. Unpacking these rivalries reveals the highly contingent nature of the Long Parliament’s fiscal experiments, while also underscoring the contribution of parliamentary revenue committees to the development of the procedures and practices that governed the growing excise establishment. It also offers a case study in how the Long Parliament and Commonwealth regimes conducted their management of the public revenue and illustrates their commitment to standards of transparency and accountability that North and Weingast ascribed to the Williamite regime (North and Weingast, 1989).

Suggested Citation

  • D’Maris Coffman, 2013. "The Case of the Soap Boilers," Palgrave Studies in the History of Finance, in: Excise Taxation and the Origins of Public Debt, chapter 5, pages 109-127, Palgrave Macmillan.
    • Handle: RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-1-137-37155-3_5
    DOI: 10.1057/9781137371553_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:psitcp:978-1-137-37155-3_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.palgrave.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.